The first page of St. Johns County’s federal beach permit carries two dates in adjacent boxes: effective 8/4/2006, and expires 8/31/2026. The box beside them, headed renewable, is checked yes.

That permit is numbered TE091980-0, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued it under 16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(1)(B). Its type line reads threatened and endangered species, incidental take. What it authorizes is the harassment, injury and death of listed sea turtles and Anastasia Island beach mice. The cause is the vehicles, the lights, the signs and the ramp grading that come with a beach the public may drive on. Nineteen pages of conditions, lettered A through S, set out what the county does in exchange.

The ground it covers is measured on the permit itself. Condition 11.E defines a Plan Area of about 41.1 miles of coastal beaches. That is the whole county shoreline, except the stretch seaward of Fort Matanzas National Monument. Inside it sits a set of County Beaches of about 28.6 miles, under the county’s direct jurisdiction or within its legal access. The western boundary of both is the Coastal Construction Control Line. The eastern limit is the mean low water line of the Atlantic Ocean.

An expiration date on a renewable permit is not the same as a stopped program, and the federal rule says so in plain terms. Under 50 CFR 13.22, an applicant for renewal has to file in writing at least 30 days before the permit expires. The same section lets the holder carry on while it waits. A person holding a valid, renewable permit may continue the activities the expired permit authorized until the Service acts on the renewal, so long as the permit was in force and neither suspended nor revoked.

Whether the county filed that application, and on what date, does not appear on any county page.

What the county did publish came three weeks after that date. On Sept. 21 its Office of Public Affairs sent out a release headed “Community Voices to Shape Future Habitat Conservation Plan in St. Johns County.” It says the plan and the permit “were approved in August 2006 and are due for renewal this year,” and that the county “will use community feedback to help identify potential updates as it works with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to develop the next plan.” It does not print the expiration date, and neither does the department page or the reports page underneath it.

The release is mostly about a survey the county put out in January. More than 1,000 residents and stakeholders answered it, according to the release. Five of the results are given as percentages. Support ran at 91 percent for nighttime beach driving restrictions during marine turtle nesting season, 90 percent for keeping the coastal lighting ordinance in force and 94 percent for more public education and signage about wildlife. It ran at 91 percent for a conservation zone kept free of encroachment, and 85 percent for restrictions on beach furniture left overnight. More than 80 comments asked for stronger enforcement of the measures already in place, and for more off-beach public parking. The survey itself is not posted.

“The survey is helping us evaluate our priorities as we move through the renewal process,” Ashley Raybould, the county’s environmental supervisor, is quoted saying in the release. “Importantly, it gives the community a voice in determining how we can continue to protect our natural resources while maintaining the public access that people value.”

The most recent compliance report the county publishes is the one for 2024, which describes the permit as being in its 19th year. It counts 864 nests from county line to county line, of which 831 were loggerhead, 20 green, 9 leatherback and 4 Kemp’s ridley. Fifty of those nests washed out. The report puts hatchling success at 85 percent and counts 66,986 hatchlings out of the sand. It splits the nesting three ways. Ninety-four nests, 11 percent, went down on beaches where driving is allowed, 735 nests, 85 percent, where it is not, and 34 nests, 4 percent, on restricted driving beaches.

The number in that report that moved was disorientation, which the county logs case by case with the direction the hatchlings travelled and the light source, where one was found. There were 87 of them recorded in 2024. The report calls that a record and the second year in a row of a significant increase, and it says they occurred in 9.9 percent of the 863 nests on county beaches. Thirty-seven of the 87 were in zones 1, 2 and 3, at the north end, where 8.9 miles of beach were being rebuilt between March and July of that nesting season. In 70 percent of those the hatchlings went north. The report offers the county’s own theory. The slope of the rebuilt beach left hatchlings unable to see the ocean, and what they could see was the Jacksonville skyglow.

The report counts 11.9 miles of St. Johns County beach nourished during that nesting season. It puts the toll season’s total revenue at $1,316,623, against $1,248,927 the year before. Staff can no longer work out how many vehicles come onto the sand in a year, the report says, only how many passes were sold.

No 2025 report is on the reports page, which carries the 2024 one alone, or in the county’s document archives, which hold 2023 and 2022. The county’s three published accounts of when this permit began do not agree either. The reports page says the plan and the permit “were approved on August 4, 2006.” The permit’s own face gives 8/4/2006 as the effective date. The 2024 compliance report says the Service issued it on August 6, 2006.

Condition G.1.b, as the 2024 report quotes it, is the condition a driver meets. From May 1 through Oct. 31, and only after the day’s nesting survey is finished, the county may authorize public vehicles outside the Conservation Zone between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. From Nov. 1 through April 30 it may authorize them at any hour. Nesting season closes Oct. 31.