The first business item on the Board of County Commissioners agenda for Tuesday, Oct. 20 concerns automated license plate readers in county rights of way. The backup filed with that item is a single page of the county standard agenda item form, and it is not a staff report.
That page carries the heading SUGGESTED MOTION/RECOMMENDATION/ACTION, and no text of any kind appears beneath that heading. The four agricultural enclave items further down the same agenda each carry two drafted motions under that identical heading, one to approve and one to deny. So the board goes into Tuesday with eight drafted motions on the land items and none at all on the cameras.
Nothing is filed behind the page either. No contract, policy, map, camera count, audit or staff report is attached to it, and those are the records a reader would need to follow what the board decides.
The form was submitted by Rich Komando, County Attorney, to Joy Andrews, County Administrator, and it carries the date Oct. 6, 2026. The field headed AGENDA TYPE on it reads Business Item, which is the classification the county uses for a matter brought to the board for discussion.
The field headed BACKGROUND INFORMATION holds two sentences, and the published agenda carries those same two sentences. They record that at its Oct. 6 meeting the board gave direction to bring the item back. The subject of that direction, in the form’s own words, was “automated license plate readers.”
Field 1 of the form asks whether funding is required and the answer recorded on it is No. Field 2 asks whether any required funding is budgeted and the answer recorded there is also No. The line headed INDICATE FUNDING SOURCE beneath them has nothing written on it.
The Sheriff published nine documents and none of them is attached
The county Sheriff’s Office published nine documents about its Flock Safety system on its own website on Oct. 13, and this newsroom reported that on Oct. 15. None of those nine documents appears in the backup to Tuesday’s item, and the item does not refer to the agency page or to any document on it. The agency published them seven days before the meeting and seven days after the date on the County Attorney’s form, so the record the Sheriff put out and the record the board is working from were assembled separately.
The footer of the form records three administrative reviews completed before publication, reading OMB: WS 10/8/2026, Legal: Rich Komando 10/8/2026, and Admin: Brad Bradley 10/9/2026. The header of the same page gives the filing deadline as 9 a.m. on the Wednesday thirteen days before the meeting.
The questions that are still out
The Tattler sent six written questions to the Sheriff’s Office on Sept. 11 about the plate reader program, with a stated deadline of 5 p.m. on Sept. 14, and the agency has not answered any of the six. The story that carried those questions said in print that any answer would run at the top of it, dated, and that offer has not been withdrawn.
The county does not publish a count of the plate reader cameras standing in a St. Johns County right of way, and the backup to Tuesday’s item does not give one either. It publishes no inventory of the devices and no map that tells a county right of way from a state one.
The meeting is at 9 a.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 20, in the County Auditorium at 500 San Sebastian View. Minutes of a regular meeting are approved at a later meeting of the board. The two regular meetings after Tuesday are Nov. 3 and Nov. 17, both at 9 a.m. in the same room. The Tattler will publish what the board does with this item and what the approved minutes record about it.
Loading comments…