St. Johns County holds its town hall on Amendment 3 at 6:30 Tuesday evening in the county auditorium, 500 San Sebastian View. It runs to 8, and it will be carried on GovTV, Facebook and YouTube.
The county’s news release of Sept. 23 asked for written questions by 5 this afternoon, through a form. Questions it does not reach, the release says, “will be answered and posted to the County’s Proposed Property Tax Amendment 3 webpage following the event.” The webpage sets no deadline.
The county’s page publishes one set of figures for what the amendment would cost, and they are the county government’s own. They run from $68.3 million in fiscal 2028 to $191.60 million in fiscal 2032. That is the county’s own share of it.
That is not the figure for the property taxes a person in this county pays.
The state report the county links to has a second set of tables, and those put a figure on every non-school taxing authority in this county at once.
Pages 5 through 9
The Revenue Estimating Conference laid this out twice, in two sets of tables that answer two different questions. Page 16 breaks each county down by government type, and that is where the county’s $68.3 million comes from. Pages 5 through 9 do it the other way, one page per fiscal year, each headed “Adopted Impact By County,” with a school column and a non-school column and dollars in millions.
The St. Johns row on those five pages reads like this.
| Fiscal year | School | Non-school, cash | Non-school, recurring |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (214.7) |
| 2027-28 | 0.0 | (76.0) | (214.7) |
| 2028-29 | 0.0 | (151.3) | (214.7) |
| 2029-30 | 0.0 | (170.0) | (214.7) |
| 2030-31 | 0.0 | (191.4) | (214.7) |
The parentheses are the state’s and they mean a reduction. The first full year is $76.0 million, not $68.3 million. The gap is the three other governments that levy a non-school property tax here, which page 16 lists separately: the independent special districts, the city of St. Augustine and St. Augustine Beach. The county government is the biggest of the four and it is not all four of them. Page 16 has the other three.
The column that does not move
The recurring figure is (214.7) on all five pages. It reads the same in the year the cash column says zero and in the year the cash column says 191.4. That column does not move at any point across the five years.
The Conference says why on page 4, and the sentence is worth having whole: “If the constitutional amendment does not pass, the impact is zero. If approved, because the provisions of the amendment related to the new homestead exemption and non-homestead assessment increase limitation are self-executing, the Conference adopted the following impact (with the 6th year cash impact being the recurring impact).”
The sixth year is 2031-32. So $214.7 million is the annual figure the state expects once the thing has finished phasing in, and the cash column is the climb to it.
Add the four St. Johns rows on page 16 across their last column and the total comes to about $214.7 million, which is the check that the two tables describe the same county. That arithmetic is not the state’s.
The county puts its own property tax revenue for the coming year at $426 million.
The school column
School reads 0.0 in both columns, in every one of the five years, for St. Johns and for the statewide total.
The county’s own FAQ answers the same question and puts it as a continuation. School district property taxes “would continue under the current law applicable to school levies, with the homestead exemption remaining capped at $25,000.”
Both of those are accurate and they are not the same sentence. Page 1 of the state analysis says what happens to that $25,000: Section 6 of Article VII would be amended “to apply the first homestead exemption only to school assessed value.” Today it comes off both bills. Under the amendment it would come off the school bill and stop coming off the county one. That is the part to notice. The figure is $25,000.
The exemption the amendment replaces is the second one, which the same page describes as applying to non-school taxes on assessed value above $50,000 and up to a maximum adjusted every year by the Consumer Price Index. Its 2026 maximum is $76,411.
What the county says it is not doing
The page says it twice. The county does not advocate for or against the amendment. It says the same about the estimates: “The revenue reduction estimates do not determine changes to a department, program, or service. Those decisions would require action through the County’s public budget process.” So nothing has been picked.
That is the same process that closed out this year’s numbers earlier this month. It meets in public.
Tuesday, 6:30, the auditorium. The form closes at 5. The release said so on the 23rd.
Loading comments…